0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
supposedly DBS takes place after BOG and before FNF so no.
super saiyan god will be in DBS?
It sounds like the series starts up near the point of the 2008 special, and continues on through at least past Battle of Gods.
For it not to go through BOG would be ridiculous. Beerus is supposed to be a regular cast member. Plus, I take it people don't want to see BOG 20 episodesifyed.And what made you come to this conclusion?
Because it's stated it begins just after the battle with Buu, and Goku appears in his 2008 costume (the farmer outfit). He and Chichi start out bickering about that in the special, with Goku trying to worm his way out of having to work (in typical "I can feel my self getting weaker!" fashion).I do hope they just use a flashback to Battle of Gods to fill in people who might not have seen it, and jump right into what comes next, though.Mind you, I could be wrong on this count. It's just a theory on the subject, and we won't know for a little bit longer.
what is 2008 special?and btw, Resurrection F english dubbed or not yet?
Both are shit so don't even bother.
Here's your reply
It's adorable how you pass judgement on the quality of that, but worship the FUNImation dub of the original series and Z, and act like it's full of consistent quality."Quality."
The jokes on you, I didn't watch the DB anime. Also, quit bringing dub wars into this thread, it's irrelevant.
I never said the Funimation dub was canonical. I said it's not as bad as you faggots say it is. This whole line of questioning is irrelevant regardless because you're just trying to call me a hypocrite, which wouldn't make my argument invalid.
This whole line of questioning is entirely relevant. You complain that it's shit writing due to inconsistency. I provided an example of something far more inconsistent and lacking in quality, which I add, you're now defending, and acting like it's not poor quality.Nobody said anything about canonicity.Your argument is invalid, as you've proven yourself to be either extremely biased or hating on it for the sake of hate, if not both. You've yet to make any sort of real argument, and the simple fact is, you constantly resort to trying to insult the other party because you have no argument to stand on.Certainly, I may have some bias toward defending the franchise... however, my argument is that it's ultimately no more inconsistent than it ever was, and is by no means breaking the established "rules" of the series. I can point out said inconsistencies and acknowledge them as dumb issues, but keep in mind, Dragon Ball is not high art, nor meant to be taken seriously.You complain about one scene in the new movie, and proclaim the entirety of it and the new series to be shit, but when someone counters that or states the same, even in multiple cases, toward something you defend, you immediately jump to action and pretend it has no flaws, even though you never provide any evidence.Now, why don't you try an actual argument, or just admit that you're a hipster?
Just because B exists, does not mean A is not a problem.My initial argument is that Ressurection F sucks because it's inconsistent. You saying that the series is always inconsistent does not disprove my claim nor illegitimize it. Let's pretend that you're right, and the series as a whole is inconsistent, how does that somehow negate my argument, if not help it? Let's say that Goku getting ohko'd out of SSGSS2 by Frieza's henchman is a joke. How would that not prove to be bad writing considering the tone of the moment directly leading up to the destruction of Earth?Your "argument" consists of nothing but problematization arguments used to ad hominem me. YYH is not perfect, the last two arcs are shit, the production values are shit, and demon yusuke is retarded.
Because you praise one thing despite it's flaws, then whine about a single flaw that's really nothing out of the ordinary for Dragon Ball?Within the bounds of Dragon Ball, there's plenty of moments where character with lower power took advantage of something like that. If that bothers you, shouldn't the whole "5 minutes until you suffocate out in the vacuum of space" thing drive you utterly bonkers, even though Goku went to the moon as a child?Didn't Kuririn once accuse Toriyama of photocopying manga Panels, to which Toriyama told his editor that he didn't have to pay him for those pages, right in the middle of a chapter on a normal canon page?Haven't you been crying about how Goku can sense Ki, but countless character who can do the same got caught off guard countless times, yet somehow you ignore those?Again, I ask you... why is this inconsistency so bad, yet the countless consistency errors of something like the FUNI dub of DBZ isn't a big deal? You claim those "aren't as bad as they're made out to be," even though these are errors that are completely irrelevant to the scene on screen, and often lose the entire purpose of the series?Why is Goku proclaiming himself "Hope of the Universe" and "Ally to Justice" to be accepted, even though it couldn't be further from the original intent, but Goku getting OHKO'd by a henchment is such a big deal?A character getting caught off guard happens countless times throughout the series, but at no point has Son Goku ever been someone who cared about justice or heroics. It may not be golden writing, but can you honestly say it's any worse than the content you constantly defend?Also, I find it hilarious how you claim ad hominem on me, when you constantly spout out insults every which way, usually without any valid reason. I'm quite certain that you've referred to anyone who disagrees with you as cocksuckers, fanboys, or faggots, if not all three.
I don't have to answer any of that because it's irrelevant. Ressurection F has multiple inconsistencies, and to conclude that the movie is shit/poorly written is a solid conclusion to make. Whether or not I care about other inconsistencies is irrelevant, because it doesn't refute my argument at all.Also, ad hominem doesn't mean insult, an ad hominem is a substitute for an argument by means of attacking your opponents person, rather than their argument. Me calling you a fanboy or a naughtyword was not replacing my argument, unlike your tu quoque where you implied I was a hypocrite. If I'm guilty of anything, it's trivial banter.Your argument is essentially, "it's ok because everyone else is doing it"